Hi I dont understand how to setup this: I dont want cryptomatte or other passes except beauty (if not multilayer) or just main exr (if multilayer) to have review tag/family
i have this settings setup this laks of beauty pattern (I’m only learning regex) but afaik this code should block cryptobatte files from review
Hey,
In the filter mentioned above, you add the regex for the AOVs, you want to mark as reviewables. Note, this adds a review tag
this regex should pick only beauty pass. .*([Bb]eauty).*
this filters works on file paths, check here this from Houdini but it’s 1:1 what happens on farm.
Here’s an example from user perspective:
I’ll usually add the aov name before the frame number.
looks like my regex is correct so why i see cryptomatte in review? may it be only in kitsu?
hmmmmmmmmmmm
looks like this filter is not working with multipart exr
but crypto is always a separate file at least in redshift so i think we need to do two sets of filders: one for multipart one for non multipart or just hardcode that we dont need to publish crypto ever
and we need to think how to deal with thix filtering since multipart exr dont have any $aov the name will be just …redshift_ropMain_####.exr
@mustafa_jafar we may need a hotfix for Houdini doing the same?
And then, actually solve this in a sustainable way over time. I recommended doing that back then but it wasn’t trivial to standardize across the board.
I just don’t like adding hardcoded values in farm/pyblish_functions.py
it can be crypto or cryptomatte, I really can’t tell.
Also, this could be solved in render collectors level where we can set the multipartExr = False if we had separated AOVs (including crypto mattes).
e.g. this Houdini redshift collector
and, instead of making a massive debug session to test all render product types in Houdini, we can just fix it one by one. based on the community feedback and client reports.
please keep in mind that this feature is meant to be used with other plugins like extract review.
therefore, the default value is set to .*([Bb]eauty).* because we only want the beauty pass to be used to extract reviews.
and, then extract reviews plugin has this tag kitsureview which tells kitsu plugin to create a comment about it.
Unfortunately, I can’t tell what are you doing wrong .
I genuinely don’t know. this might need a debug session.